YSaC, Vol. 580: Sweet …

2010 February 17
tags:
by drmk

16 – $35


Good working condition.

Damn. Where were you yesterday when I needed a 16? Today I need a 17. Tomorrow I’m going to need a 23 (inflation, you understand … ).

Thanks, dwalter!

117 Responses leave one →
  1. 2010 February 17
    Lola permalink

    I’ll totally pay $35 to be 16 again, albeit only temporarily, considering the kind of work I did at that age. The need to have a professional job as an adult is made up for by not being a minor and having my own house; I don’t think I could trade that, even for youth.
    I’m not paying for a 16-year-old though, not even at that price; too many legal and ethical/moral issues, plus no gender specification. Also, they eat a lot if they’re boys, and if they’re girls they often don’t eat enough and then whinge about being fat when they aren’t, at least in my experience. I have a full set of my own neuroses to keep me occupied, thank you very much!

    Adores: 16
    • 2010 February 17
      Ed Snyder permalink

      You know what they say: buy a 16 now get a free 20 later.

      Adores: 7
      • 2010 February 17
        Bianchi Sound permalink

        In Thailand?

        Adores: 4
      • 2010 February 17
        Windrose permalink

        I thought it was 16 will get you 20. 8)

        Adores: 5
        • 2010 February 17
          Hartster permalink

          Well, a 16 in Base 8 _is_ a 20, Ed.

          Adores: 2
        • 2010 February 17
          jackie31337 permalink

          But it’s only 10 in hexadecimal.

          Adores: 2
        • 2010 February 17
          CapnMac permalink

          But, it’s -2 in Base_cat

          Adores: 8
        • 2010 February 17
          Laurelhach permalink

          I thought we graduated from Cat Math.

          Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 18
          Windrose permalink

          Laurelhach, this is the remedial class for those of us who didn’t make the cut. Sigh.

          Adores: 1
    • 2010 February 17
      Artsy Computer Geek permalink

      I have a male 16. You’d go broke. I know he doesn’t do $35 worth of work even on a good day. Consuming $35+ of food is another story.

      Adores: 15
      • 2010 February 17
        Windrose permalink

        Artsy, I have a male 17, who drives. At least he has a job now, so he will be less of an economic drain on his parental units.

        Adores: 4
        • 2010 February 18
          Windrose permalink

          Update: He’s buying a motorcycle. >o<

          Adores: 1
    • 2010 February 17
      CapnMac permalink

      Amen, sister Lola.
      Nothing about my sixteen that really requires revisiting (or risking the quantum consequences thereafter, either).
      Not all that keen on the company of 16 year olds as is, either.

      It’s a bad age for both pets and livestock.

      It’s the worst blackjack hand, too–too low to stand; too high to hit.

      And, lest we needed another reason to abjure 16, if it were a good thing, single malt would be aged that long. Qou erat imbibere demonstratom.

      Adores: 4
    • 2010 February 17

      I quite enjoyed being 16. Except for the crippling fear and self loathing. Yup. All was good.

      Adores: 8
  2. 2010 February 17
    Andrea permalink

    Good working condition? Yeah, that 16 yr old slave better be in good working condition if I’m paying a whole $35 for ‘im!

    Adores: 1
  3. 2010 February 17
    Lilly permalink

    Maybe it is $35 for 16 hyphens? I am sure a lot of craigslist users could use some punctuation.

    Adores: 13
    • 2010 February 17
      emesis permalink

      This is a good guess. However, that would mean he had 17 hyphens before he wrote the ad, right? What a moron. Hyphens don’t grow on trees, you know.

      /_
      |/
      |_/
      |
      |

      (hyphen tree. original art by not.a.silva)

      Edit to add: I assure you, this hyphen tree was *much* nicer with my original formatting. Too bad I suck at xhtml. Oh well. You guys have good imaginations. Just pretend it was a semi-recognizable tree shape, and go from there.

      Adores: 7
      • 2010 February 17

        I’m trying emesis, truly I am, but I’m not seeing a tree there, sorry.

        Is it like one of those magic eye pictures though? Because no matter how much I stare at those things all I see is a blur.

        Adores: 0
        • 2010 February 17
          TacoMmagic permalink

          Some people’s family trees don’t have forks in them…

          Adores: 2
        • 2010 February 17
          emesis permalink

          Sigh… It was a very *nice* tree, I swear. As nice as a tree made of punctuation can be, if it is made by an inbred naked mole rat in under 30 seconds.

          Adores: 2
        • 2010 February 17
          Windrose permalink

          Dev, if you move the top mark down to the left side, the second mark become the top, and the third mark is the right side. Then I think the last two marks should be side by side. It IS a nice tree!

          Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 17
          CapnMac permalink

          “I’m trying emesis, truly I am,”

          Ok, I had to read that three times, to finally realize you were not attempting to improve your visual perception by way of regurgitation.

          I do appreciate that seeing poorly pruned trees can raise a person’s gorge; but there are a number of OTC remedies for that.

          Adores: 3
        • 2010 February 19
          Sosij permalink

          I know it’s not exactly treelike, but there’s no reason to try emesis!

          Adores: 0
  4. 2010 February 17
    Camille permalink

    I’m actually in the market for a new 16 – my current 16 has only 6 sides, seats 8, and is a 5 x 7 square, so it would be a relief to get my hands on a 16 in good working condition. I just have a few questions before I fork over my $35.

    1. Does it have a minty shell?
    2. Is it equipped for cat math?
    3. Will it fit under my ottoman?
    4. Many more, too many to list.

    Adores: 47
  5. 2010 February 17
    lost_compass permalink

    With the normal Craigslist math:

    7 – $10
    6 – $10
    3 – $10

    or take them all for $35.

    Adores: 30
    • 2010 February 17
      TacoMmagic permalink

      Shouldn’t it be:

      7 – $10
      6 – $10
      5 – $10

      or take all 16 for $35.

      Adores: 19
      • 2010 February 17
        Bianchi Sound permalink

        I believe you mean:

        7 – Free
        6 – Free
        5 – Free

        or take all 16 for $35.

        Adores: 33
  6. 2010 February 17

    Can this 16 be used to keep my daughter from turning 17 next month? I’d pay $35 to keep that from happening.

    Adores: 6
    • 2010 February 17
      Windrose permalink

      kelli, I’m afraid you’ll have to use the old fashioned method: Lock her in her room until she’s 18.

      Adores: 1
  7. 2010 February 17

    I can totally relate to wanting 16 minuses for $35, but I think I’d rather have 16 plusses. At this point in my life, I find plusses useful as the minuses tend to pile up.

    I could trade my minuses for some rare cereals, or even a minty shell.

    I don’t want any snow, though, had enough of that crap last week and now…it’s just mud.

    Adores: 1
    • 2010 February 17
      TacoMmagic permalink

      Well… two minuses do make a plus… so really it’s $35 for 8 plusses.

      I don’t know if that’s a good price or not.

      Adores: 1
      • 2010 February 17

        Sheesh! What a rip-off! I’ll just take the 16 minuses and make my own plusses, thankyouverrrymuch.

        Adores: 2
  8. 2010 February 17
    TacoMmagic permalink

    I remember when I sold my 18 for $12 last week. I feel ripped off now. I bet this was the very guy who bought it from me, knocked off two, and now is reselling it for a big upcharge.

    Don’t be fooled people! It’s just a refurbished 18!

    *Shakes his fist*

    Adores: 22
    • 2010 February 17

      Yes, but did it have the minty shell when you sold it?

      Adores: 4
  9. 2010 February 17
    Bavec permalink

    I’ve got it! This is the price for 16 cats 3. That sounds reasonable, I guess.

    Adores: 4
    • 2010 February 17

      I dunno…for $35 I’d need at least elebenty cats.

      Adores: 5
    • 2010 February 17

      Cat Math is too hard for me! I can never figure out how to make my answers come out to elebenty spinach dip!

      *cries*

      Adores: 2
  10. 2010 February 17

    Maybe the seller is actually trying to sell one ‘6’. We’ll never know.

    Adores: 3
  11. 2010 February 17
    screamer permalink

    Maybe it’s 16 Not.A.Lions and he just knew that we would know that. A picture of a Not.A.Lion would have helped in our understanding sooner though.

    Adores: 2
  12. 2010 February 17
    Hartster permalink

    The poster is obviously that Muppet on Sesame Street who wore a trenchcoat and was always trying to sell letters. Now they’ve branched out into selling numbers; I guess there’s no more sunny days when the Great Recession hits Sesame Street.

    Adores: 17
    • 2010 February 17
      Camille permalink

      That Muppet used to charge a nickel. Inflation has clearly hit Sesame Street too!

      Adores: 2
    • 2010 February 17
      TacoMmagic permalink

      Luckily it didn’t really affect Oscar that much.

      Though seeing Big Bird selling himself on the street corner, boy that really drove home how bad the recession has gotten.

      Next they’ll be downsizing their alphabet to only 15 letters and selling off all the even numbers.

      Adores: 1
      • 2010 February 17
        Hartster permalink

        No the recession really hit home when Elmo was charging people $5 to “tickle” him, nudge nudge, wink wink.

        I also heard Bert and Ernie and Gordon and Susan got their apartment foreclosed on and a Walmart will be built in its place.

        Adores: 4
  13. 2010 February 17
    PrincessLuceval permalink

    It really depends. If it’s a 4×4, it might be worth it. An 8×2? not so much. And a 16×1 is just a rip off.

    Adores: 2
    • 2010 February 17
      emesis permalink

      I’m trying to picture the 16×1. Would it be a kind of limo-cycle?

      Adores: 2
      • 2010 February 17
        CapnMac permalink

        Would it be a kind of limo-cycle?

        “Centipede” to use the trucking/transport term.

        – : : : : : : : –

        One of those singles will be powered, tyically in a “tractor” fashion. Symmetrical design lets the unit reverse by just swapping which single is the drive wheel.

        Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 17
          mudslicker permalink

          CapnCorey!

          🙂

          Adores: 2
        • 2010 February 17
          emesis permalink

          I dunno about this “centipede” thing. Seems like the term wouldn’t apply in this case unless you cut off all except the front legs, and then strapped its ass on a skateboard. And that’s just sick and twisted. Why would you even suggest such a thing?!

          Adores: 0
        • 2010 February 17
          CapnMac permalink

          Well, I am given to understand that the over-the-road trucking community first started using the term for any trailer with more than ten tires on the road.

          I have some compadres in the “special loads” trade, who have a “low-boy” trailer which can be configured to be slung between combinations of bogie wheel sets, ranging from ten tires to 14 tires to distribute the load to the pavement.
          The service is so specialized, you pay for the empty trailer as well as the full one. So, either there are “mor’ tar’s on’ground t’an a center-peed” or the separate bogies are toted on the lowboy in a collection of less-identifiable trailer parts and tires and wheels.

          There is no intent toward either vivisection nor malicious abuse of Chilopdae, merely a term-of-art from a specialized argot.

          Adores: 2
    • 2010 February 17
      CapnMac permalink

      Maybe it’s a stray bit of string theory experiment apparatatus, as it could be 2^4, and the rest of the description is expressed in that fourth spatial dimension.

      Adores: 0
  14. 2010 February 17
    Irregular Fractal permalink

    This guy seems to be a bit of a square.

    Adores: 5
    • 2010 February 17
      TacoMmagic permalink

      Yeah, he doesn’t really seem to be rooted in reality either.

      Adores: 4
      • 2010 February 17
        Irregular Fractal permalink

        That would seem two be a prime factor in all this.

        Adores: 6
        • 2010 February 17
          TacoMmagic permalink

          Too bad it’s all imaginary anyway.

          Adores: 5
    • 2010 February 17
      jackie31337 permalink

      Oh get real! Let’s try to keep this discussion rational.

      Adores: 6
      • 2010 February 17
        TacoMmagic permalink

        Oh go climb up a pole, Jackie.

        Adores: 2
  15. 2010 February 17
    Windrose permalink

    If this 16 is 5 x 7, I have a space on my wall for it, but for $35 the seller will need to deliver.

    Adores: 2
  16. 2010 February 17
    MrWhite permalink

    Seems reasonable, if it’s late 60s or early 70s, with David Cassidy on the cover. It would fit nicely with my Tiger Beat Bobby Sherman issue.

    Adores: 5
    • 2010 February 17
      TacoMmagic permalink

      Not.a.Lion. Beat

      Adores: 15
    • 2010 February 17
      Andrea permalink

      Now all I can think of is JTT and Andrew Keegan. Sooooo dreamy!

      Adores: 4
    • 2010 February 17
      Elle permalink

      Eh, David Cassidy was alright, but my heart will always belong to Shaun. Hardy Boys beat the Partridge Family any day.

      Adores: 0
  17. 2010 February 17
    christina permalink

    16-$35=X
    Now get out sarajean’s magic calculator and solve for X

    Adores: 2
    • 2010 February 17

      Pancakes!!

      Adores: 7
      • 2010 February 17
        Minion permalink

        The answer is ALWAYS cookies!

        Adores: 0
        • 2010 February 17

          Hey! I thought the answer was always 42??

          Adores: 5
        • 2010 February 17

          Except when it’s pancakes.

          Adores: 4
        • 2010 February 17
          TacoMmagic permalink

          √Pancakes = cookies

          Adores: 2
        • 2010 February 17
          Lola permalink

          But isn’t it sammiches, at least sometimes?
          Mmmm, sammiches, then cookies. 🙂

          … Yes, it is getting close to lunch here, why?

          Adores: 2
        • 2010 February 17

          Oh, you guys are making me wish I could chew today.

          Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 17
          Lola permalink

          *shakes package*
          Protein shake, Isaac?

          Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 17
          Windrose permalink

          Mmm, chthulhu just made a toasted bagel ham and cheese sammich for me. Yum!

          Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 17
          Meredith permalink

          I thought the answer was always 34? At least, that’s what the internets taught me.

          Adores: 2
        • 2010 February 17

          I thought according to the famous Cat Math calculator the answer was usually pilchards, or maybe tuna?

          Adores: 0
        • 2010 February 17
          TacoMmagic permalink

          I made a bone-in ham for Valentine’s day. Since then I’ve been having grilled ham, cheese, and egg on whole wheat sandwiches. If I keep this up I’m gonna be huge.

          For those who want delisciousness:
          Ingredients:
          1 egg
          1 *blorp* milk
          1 slice ham
          1/2 cup shredded cheese
          2 slices awesome bread (I perfer whole wheat for mine)
          butter or margerine

          •Heat a large frying pan or griddle with a little bit of butter or margerine.
          •Whisk the egg together with your blorp of milk.
          •Place the slice of ham on the griddle.
          •Butter one side of both pieces of the bread and place on griddle butter down, drissle the non-butter side of the bread with 1/4 each of the egg mixture.
          •Pour remaining egg mixture in a small pool on the griddle.
          •As the bread is toasted and the ham becomes sizzly, turn them over.
          •Once the egg has solidified, turn it over and sprinkle with half the cheese.
          •Once all ingredients are cooked, and the cheese melted stack in desired order, sprinking remaining cheese just under the top layer.
          •Suggested stack order: Bread, Egg, Ham, Cheese, Bread).
          •Eat.

          Adores: 2
        • 2010 February 17
          christina permalink

          I nominate 1 *blorp* of milk as the band name of the day.

          Adores: 9
        • 2010 February 17

          ∙ Contact cardiologist for possible bypass surgery

          Oh wait, you used whole wheat bread. Should be o.k.

          Adores: 7
        • 2010 February 17
          TacoMmagic permalink

          The really sad thing is that that sandwich is probably healthier than half of a Big Mac.

          Also healthier than 1/4 cup of ranch dressing I’d guess. Most things are anyway.

          Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 18
          Windrose permalink

          jg, does that mean the huge slice of chocolate cake won’t hurt me if I drink a diet cola with it? 8) Dude, you can be MY nutritionist!

          Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 18

          Hey TM, is the bonin’ ham for Valentine’s day a pun? ‘Cause that’s what I would make.

          Adores: 3
      • 2010 February 18
        emesis permalink

        I was wondering about the bone-in ham, too, and wondering how TMm gets away with calling his spouse a pig. On valentine’s day, no less.

        Adores: 0
        • 2010 February 18
          Lola permalink

          Wasn’t gonna say anything either, but … thirded. As for calling his wife a pig – hey, you never can predict people’s nicknames. (And often you don’t want to know the backstory.)

          Adores: 0
        • 2010 February 18
          TacoMmagic permalink

          You might remember that my Child’s nicknames include Metatron and Creepy. I wouldn’t take anything for granted were I you.

          Adores: 0
      • 2010 February 19
        EclecticBlue permalink

        A blorp of milk? That sounds a lot like the sound my 5-month old makes when he spits up after eating too much–and probably close to the amount you’re thinking of, too. I think I will -not- add a blorp of milk to my sandwiches, thankyouverymuch…

        Adores: 0
  18. 2010 February 17
    Irregular Fractal permalink

    Someone should put up listings for 4, 8, 15, 23, and 42 and see if someone goes after them all. It could explain a whole lot.

    Adores: 5
    • 2010 February 17
      Lurker From the North permalink

      Would you have to ship them via Oceanic Airways?

      Adores: 4
    • 2010 February 17
      Laurelhach permalink

      I’d go after them–but I’d come in the middle of the night and you’d never catch me. And I would have to have my own cool trombone theme music.

      Adores: 1
  19. 2010 February 17
    Nicole permalink

    You all read it wrong. It’s Six Teen{s}. Clearly this person is trying to sell their six teens as a package deal. They disguise the real items as a number to throw you off.
    I’m just trying to figure out how they came up with $35. $36 would make more sense at $6 a teen. Must be one of those newfangled “discounts” I’ve been hearing about.

    Adores: 3
  20. 2010 February 17
    Yancy permalink

    My snark-free theory is this – This is an ad for a shotgun. Since craigslist policy prohibits selling guns, ammo, gun parts, ammo parts, things that sound like the word “gun”, things that look like guns, things that smell like guns…, people who want to sell their firearms on CL use as obscure language as they can, but sometimes overdo it. Thus a Colt .45 cal 1911M1 could become anything, including just “Colt”, “1911”, “.45”, etc. This ad for “16” could mean “Benelli (or other brand) 16-gauge double-barrel break-open action shotgun with custom engraving and double-trigger.” If this is the case though, in trying to obscure the facts as much as possible the poster accidentally omitted at least one zero from the price. Any gun for $35 is most certainly not in good working condition. Unfortunately, since I’m not a morning person (and here I use “morning” to mean any part of the day that comes between at least an hour before sunrise and the first hint of sunset) I used all of my creativity coming up with a snark-free theory, so now I can’t come up with a snark-full theory. Gonna go watch swaying blades of grass now.

    Adores: 17
    • 2010 February 17

      Yeah, but for $35 can you trust it NOT to blow up in your face first time out?

      I know I wouldn’t.

      Adores: 4
    • 2010 February 17

      Most reasonable non-snarky explanation I’ve heard so far. I see a lot of ads advertising “bang bangs” and similar euphemisms, trying to get around the prohibition.

      Adores: 3
    • 2010 February 17
      Lurker From the North permalink

      Wow, you got all that from four numbers a dash and a dollar sign. I am impressed. With creativity like that you don’t need snark.

      Adores: 1
    • 2010 February 17
      mudslicker permalink

      I believe Yancy’s snark-less hypothesis was disguising a bit of DA minty corey wisdom…

      Adores: 4
      • 2010 February 17

        True, that.

        Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 17
          Windrose permalink

          And pithy.

          Adores: 1
      • 2010 February 17
        emesis permalink

        … Except that it was disguised about as well as a not.a.lion…

        Adores: 2
    • 2010 February 17
      CapnMac permalink

      Hey, you may be on to something here. There’s a 12″ “Hunter Bob” line of action figures, which, like more 1/6 action figures, have accessories.

      CL (like eBay and TSA) has banned “toy” representations before. Berhaps this is a second listing of a 1/16 benneli 16ga?

      As good an answer as this is misspelling and was supposed to be i6=$35

      Adores: 0
    • 2010 February 17
      BigUncleJohn permalink

      Today’s YS@C is brought to you by:

      The numbers 16 and 35; by the words “working” and “good”; and by “numerical units”.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHo837bnbMI

      What? Oh, sorry. Scratch that bit about “numerical units”. No one uses THOSE any more.

      Adores: 0
  21. 2010 February 17

    Maybe a 16 is a car.

    Adores: 1
  22. 2010 February 17
    tigprincess permalink

    I was thinking it could be someone’s vital statistics: 16 chest $ waist and 35 hips. Oh! That’s a triangle.
    The answer is 42.

    Adores: 4
    • 2010 February 17

      But what is the question?

      Adores: 2
      • 2010 February 17

        Doesn’t matter, the answer is always 42…..unless we’re talking pancakes. Then, I think, the answer is either cookies or sammiches.

        Adores: 2
  23. 2010 February 17

    My first thought was: drug lingo. Don’t know what that says about me…

    Adores: 2
    • 2010 February 17
      Windrose permalink

      Hmm, lareina, maybe it says that you are a material girl, living in a material world? Don’t ask me what THAT means, though.

      Adores: 2
    • 2010 February 17

      If it helps Lareina, you’re not the only one whose mind went there.

      Adores: 1
      • 2010 February 17

        Yay! Drugs for everyone! *unscrews cap of prescription bottle*

        Adores: 1
        • 2010 February 17
          Lola permalink

          *lines up*
          Everyone has better scrips than I do. (Especially my parents. Their medicine cabinet has at least a four-figure, if not higher, street value.)

          Adores: 0
    • 2010 February 25
      Dan permalink

      I think it’s a drug reference too. A certain drug is 50-60 for an 8th ounce, so I think this person might be trying to sell 1/16th of an ounce for 35.

      Adores: 0
  24. 2010 February 17
    Windrose permalink

    Hey, congratulations, keelhaulrose! (Are we related?) Here’s your first card punch!

    Adores: 0
  25. 2010 February 17

    Oh this is a bargain for a /16, that’s 255.255.0.0 in base 10 or 11111111 11111111 00000000 00000000 in binary,
    That give you 35,535 Ip addresses, at just over 10 Cents per address!!

    I’ll take two or 0010…

    Adores: 0
    • 2010 February 17

      That should be just under .10 Cents, my cat was helping me with the math…

      Adores: 1
  26. 2010 February 17

    Please tell me that’s an intended “Lost” reference. (i.e.- 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42)

    Adores: 0
    • 2010 February 17
      Steph permalink

      Well, it was a reference to something at one point, and the reference got lost…

      Adores: 0
  27. 2010 February 18
    Windrose permalink

    Hey we broke 100! I can’t wait for tomorrow’s post, probably some nut trying to sell you power harnessed from the sun. Yeah, right. G’night folks!

    Adores: 1
  28. 2010 December 1

    we always keep track of our family tree because it is exciting to know the family tree :`*

    Adores: 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.